REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA SOBRE MEDIÇÃO DE DESEMPENHO PARA GESTÃO DAS CADEIAS DE SUPRIMENTO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22407/1984-5693.2025.v17.p.20251713Resumo
Diante da crescente importância e papel relevante da cadeia de suprimentos dentro das organizações, a medição do desempenho surge como uma necessidade para a gestão eficiente e a obtenção de resultados positivos. Diversas metodologias e estudos já foram apresentados na literatura com o objetivo de classificar indicadores que direcionem corretamente as empresas do desenvolvimento de cadeias de suprimento de alta performance. Assim sendo, o presente artigo realiza uma revisão sistemática da literatura sobre a medição do desempenho das cadeias de suprimento utilizando a metodologia para itens de relatório preferenciais para revisão sistemática e metanálise (Prisma – Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic
Reviews and Meta-Analyses). Como resultado, demonstra as metodologias e indicadores utilizados ao longo dos últimos cinco anos. Essa análise visa fornecer insights importantes para aprimorar a gestão de cadeia de suprimentos e promover o desenvolvimento de estratégias eficientes.
Referências
ARIA, M; CUCCURULLO, C. Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics 11(4), 959-971, 2017.
AHMAD, K.; ZABRI, S.The deployment of performance measurement system under the supply chain management environment: the case of Malaysian manufacturing companies. Management and Production Engineering Review 9(1), 3-12, 2018.
BEAMON, BM. 1999. Measuring supply chain performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 19(3), 275-292.
BOONSOTHONSATIT, G. Generic decision support system to leverage supply chain performance (GLE) for SMEs in Thailand Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 28(6), 737–748, 2017.
CAI, J; LIU, X; LIU, J. Improving supply chain performance management: A systematic approach to analyzing iterative KPI accomplishment. Decision Support Systems 46, 512-521, 2009.
CHIA, A; GOH, M; HUM, SH. Performance measurement in supply chain entities: balanced scorecard perspective. Benchmarking: An International Journal 16(5), 605-620, 2009.
CROXTON, KL et al. The Supply Chain Management Processes. International Journal of Logistic Management 12(2), 13-36, 2001
DUMITRASCU, O. Criterial suppliers’ evaluation model aimed at SCM performance, production and engineering process’s improvement. Balkan Region Conference on Engineering and Business Education 3(1), 45–51, 2017.
EQUBAL, Md A. et al. A comprehensive model for supply chain performance measurement: Application in the coal beneficiation plant of steel manufacturing company. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM). IEEE, 2017.1401-1406.
GANGA, GM; CARPINETTI, LC; POLITANO, PR. A fuzzy logic approach to supply chain performance management. Gest. Prod., São Carlos 18(4), 755-774, 2011.
GARTNER. Our methodology: How Gartner selects the top 25. Supply Chain Manag. Rev. 2015, 19, 23.
GULLEDGE, T; CHAVUSHOLU, T. Enterprise Integration, Inc., Alexandria, Virginia, USA and George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA, and Automating the construction of supply chain key performance indicators. Industrial Management & Data Systems 108(6), 750-774, 2008.
GUNASEKARAN, A; PATEL, C; MCGAUGHEY, RE. A framework for supply chain performance measurement. International Journal of Production Economics 87(3), 333–347, 2004.
KAYA SAMUT, P.; ERDOĞAN AKTAN, H. Integrating qualitative and quantitative factors in supplier selection and performance evaluation. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering 30(2), 146–160, 2019.
KRUSE, CJ et al. Developing and implementing a port fluidity performance measurement methodology using automatic identification system data. Transportation Research Record 2672(11), 30–40, 2018.
LAMBERT, D; POHLEN, T. Supply Chain Metrics. The International Journal of Logistics Management 12(1), 1-19, 2001.
LIAO, Y et al. Past, present and future of Industry 4.0 - a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. International Journal of Production Research 55(12), 3609–3629, 2017.
LIMA-JUNIOR, FR; CARPINETTI, LCR. An adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system to supply chain performance evaluation based on SCOR® metrics. Computers and Industrial Engineering 139, November 2019, 106191, 2020.
MOHER, D. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int. J. Surg. 8(5), 336-341, 2010.
NETO M, PIRES SRI. Performance measurement in supply chains: a study in the automotive industry; Gest. Prod. 19(4) São Carlos, Oct./Dec. 2012.
NERI, A; CAGNO, E; LEPRI, M; TRIANNI, A. A triple bottom line balanced set of key performance indicators to measure the sustainability performance of industrial supply chains. Sustainable Production and Consumption 26, 648–691, 2021.
PIRES, SRI. Gestão da cadeia de suprimentos e o modelo de consórcio modular. Revista de administração – USP 33(3), 5-15, 1998.
PIRES, SRI. Gestão da Cadeia de Suprimentos: conceitos, estratégias, práticas e casos. São Paulo, SP: Ed. Atlas, 2004.
RICHEY JUNIOR, RG et al. The moderating role of barriers on the relationship between drivers to supply chain integration and firm performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 39(10), 826-840, 2009.
SHEPHERD, C; GUNTER, H. Measuring supply chain performance: current research and future directions. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 55(3-4) 242-258, 2006.
SUTRISNO, A et al. Categorization of Reliability Performance Indicators of Humanitarian Response Supply Chain. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 722(1), 2020.
UCENIC, CI; RATIU, C. Improving Performance in Supply Chain. MATEC Web of Conferences 137, 1–6, 2017.
UHLMANN, IR; FRAZZON, EM. Production rescheduling review: Opportunities for industrial integration and practical applications. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 49, n. September, 186–193, 2018.
WIEGMANS, B; JANIC, M. Analysis, modeling, and assessing performances of supply chains served by long-distance freight transport corridors. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 13(4), 278–293, 2019.
YEH, DY; CHENG, CH; CHI, ML. A modified two-tuple FLC model for evatuating the performance of SCM: by the six sigma DMAIC process. Applied Soft Computing 7, 1027-1034, 2007
YOVITA, FJ et al. Improvement of supply chain performance on pt surya toto indonesia TBK. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering 9(4), 6324–6330, 2020.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Direitos autorais (c) 2025 Revista Eletrônica Perspectivas da Ciência e Tecnologia - ISSN: 1984-5693
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Autores que submetem trabalhos a esta conferência aceitam que esta revista, bem como todo e qualquer trabalho publicado nela, estão sob licença Creative Commons 4.0 do tipo: CC BY - NC
